[tacticalogic]

I dismiss it because it gives one man's opinion of how the Commerce Clause can be used, not what it is, or how it should be used.

A disingenuous argument. The one man is the author of the clause - the one person who should be considered most authoritative on it's meaning and use. As far as the rest of it goes, insisting that there is nothing there concerning it's purpose and intent is your opinion, which I find to be little more than an exercise in willful ignorance.

[robertpaulsen]

Hey, it's your cite. You thought it was important enough to post.

Is there something there to illustrate "it's purpose and intent"? Care to highlight what you think is relevant?