Aside from that, the whole point of us walling ourselves inside the United States is ridiculous. What's more, the founding fathers didn't believe that nonsense either. That's why the Monroe Doctrine was put into effect after the British invaded the United States and burned Washington D.C. down to the ground in the War of 1812. After that happened, our founding fathers made a conscious decision that our basic war strategy from thence forward would be to never fight a war again on American soil. As a result, the Monroe Doctrine was put into effect which warned all foreign powers not to take any hostile actions in the Western Hemisphere. The Monroe Doctrine didn't say don't invade us or do anything that might specifically result in an invasion of our land. Rather, the Monroe Doctrine said don't do anything anywhere in either South or North American that we might interpret as a hostile action.
As a result, this idea that there was once some magical time in our past when we ignored threats from foreign powers until they actually reached our shores is a fantasy. And what's more -- it is a dangerous fantasy.
Correction, I asked if it was baseless slander. To date you've provided no basis for me to assume the slander has merit.
Now you are saying that we provide too much aid to Israel.
No, I simply showed that being against sending American taxpayer dollars to another nation is Washingtonian, unless you now contend that George Washington is also an 'arabist', because he didn't want us to get America wrapped around the axle of other nation's intrigues.
Whether or not that is the case, I take it you now agree that it is not a slander to call Novak an Arabist?
A failure on your part to provide any evidence that Novak is an 'arabist' has not compelled me to agree with you. The smear is still baseless, as "I say so!" isn't very convincing evidence on your part.