Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Melas
It's a matter of averages. How many Marines have you known that were that small? More women than men on average are under 5'4" and 145lbs. I can count on one hand the number of men I've known under 140lb. and 5'. The women would take a lot longer to count.

Although, for the sake of fairness, any woman or man who can carry the weight and walk the walk, let em go. I knew a guy in high school who could bench nearly twice his weight.

Of course, that still doesn't solve the problem of men trying to protect the women in their unit. It's still a distraction. I believe same sex units, men only and women only are the way to go. If we had that, the women could afford a few looser standards. They'd be fighting next to their own.

115 posted on 05/31/2004 5:43:33 PM PDT by TheLurkerX ("PELOSI, PUT DOWN THE LIGHTER, AND BACK AWAY FROM THE CRACK PIPE.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]


To: TheLurkerX
It's a matter of averages. How many Marines have you known that were that small? More women than men on average are under 5'4" and 145lbs. I can count on one hand the number of men I've known under 140lb. and 5'. The women would take a lot longer to count.

Irrelevant. We don't admit genders to the armed forces, we admit individuals, so averages really mean nothing here. Each individual recruit will go through an elaborate screening process. If it's true, as posted earlier that 5'4" and 145 pounds is genuinely to small to be effective as a Marine (for this example) then surely the policy admitting 4'10" 96 pound men needs to be changed. It wouldn't even be difficult. Overnight, it could be changed to 5'8" and 170 if that's what is desired.

116 posted on 05/31/2004 5:49:54 PM PDT by Melas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson