Replies

Let the record show that I modified my original statement by inserting the word "appears."

You mean CHANGED YOUR STANCE UNDER PRESSURE? You posted exactly what you meant, with the sarcasm, "I sure hope he enjoys this life....." You ain't foolin' nobody. You folded when you caught flack, but you expect the Iraqi Christian not to fold when he has a gun pointed at him. That's rich.

I did not lie as you admitted in a later post.

I admitted nothing. I said, if you truly believed I attacked you, and not your statement, that I apologized. But I see that you are disingenuous and a waffling, folding hypocrite.

By you taking things out of context and twisting them, it is YOU that is a LIAR! And you're STILL obnoxious and a HARRIDAN as well.

I added nor subtracted anything from your post #6, it speaks quite clearly. Except if you count post #374 ,(368 posts later) the "er I really meant to say" post. Which means the same thing to me anyway, unless you take out the sarcastic, "hope he enjoys this life" sentence, in which case it would be you twisting and taking things out of context, now wouldn't it? Or is it a matter of "depends on what the meaning of the word "is" is?

I did, and I modified to include the word "appeared."

I stand by it.How brave of you to stand by changing your stance.

I really shouldn't respond to this, but....

I modified my original position in post #6 by stating the words "it appears" should have been in my original post.

#202: Christian lied about faith to survive Saudi siege To: inflation
I claim to be smart enough to state that he appears to have lost his eternal life.
My bad. My original post should have had the word "appears" in it.
202 posted on 05/31/2004 1:18:59 PM EDT by sauropod (Paleo-cons make better lovers)

I modified my original quote because of course no man knows what is in the heart of another. It is impossible for me to state then, that so and so has lost eternal life.

I did NOT change it because of "pressure."

I changed it to be more exact of what I believe to be true.

BTW, my correction is first in post #202, not in #374 as you claim.

With the modification "It appears" to be added to my original post, I stand by my original post.

And, honey, it's not me that is the waffling hypocrite here.

Examine what you've posted and see if your attitude is the "Christian" one to have. Methinks you would have been yelling "Free Barabbas! Free Barrabas!"