[Badray]

"If Specter's 'Rat opponent were a pro-life moderate, like Bob Casey or Tim Holden, I would support you wholeheartedly. Problem is, Specter at his very worse is far, far better than Joe Hoeffel at his best. The 'Rats foolishly nominated someone from the far left of the political spectrem. So you should change your mind. Conservatives should hold their noses and vote for Specter."

Thanks for joining the debate, but I am/we are as specterfatigued as you are clintonfatigued.

He has obstructed our first (and maybe, once) in a lifetime chance of a Republican elected govenment in Washington implimenting policy to advance our values. If reelected, he will ascend to chair two of the most powerful committees in the first two years of the next term. His pro baby killing votes, government is the solution attitude, anti gun rights bias, and big tax and spend habits make him off limits to conservatives and SHOULD even make him totally unacceptable to the rest of the Republican party.

[Clintonfatigued]

I don't blame you for being Specterfatigued (good choice of words). He isn't one of my favorites, either. I would like to see a pro-life, pro-gun, fair-trade conservative replace him, myself. But this isn't the year it happens. Furthermore, the election isn't an up-or-down referendum on one Senator, it's a choice between two candidates. It's either Specter or Hoeffel. Do you really think Hoeffel's voting record will be any better than Specter's?