Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: oceanview
Don't nuclear weapons need maintenance? Not something they can put in place and just leave till time to go boom!
2,539 posted on 06/06/2004 8:01:42 AM PDT by DAVEY CROCKETT (There is no such thing as coincidence, GOD is in control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2533 | View Replies ]


To: DAVEY CROCKETT

Everybody, still nursing my racing upset and found this:

Disease could affect 2005 Triple Crown field
Mares delivering weak foals; more than 2,200 have died

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5139088/


2,540 posted on 06/06/2004 8:11:03 AM PDT by Letitring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2539 | View Replies ]

To: DAVEY CROCKETT

The radiation source - the nuclear material itself - doesn't need maintenance.

The circuitry needed to detonate a weapon does need maintenance and is pretty fragile.

The tritium used to boost the yield of a fission weapon, and which is involved in the fusion reaction process, does decay fairly quickly but that isn't radioactive.

The radiological source (Uranium or Plutonium) in a lost or abandonned nuke, could be re-used in a dirty bomb. If whoever came into possession of the source had the technical know-how, and certain tools and machinery, it could be recycled into another nuclear weapon, a la "Sum of All Fears".

The tough part about building a nuke is getting hold of the fissionable nuclear material, which is supposedly tightly controlled.


2,547 posted on 06/06/2004 9:01:54 AM PDT by StillProud2BeFree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2539 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson