[BlessedByLiberty]

I think you have it.

In essence did one of Moore's adolescent approaches to "movie making" lead to the death of an American?

The overriding material question remains: is Michael Moore complicit in the death of Nick Berg?

[Miss Marple]

Here is another thing to think about....Cannes. The jury was unanimous, but made the point that the decision was NOT political, but rather for his skill in documentary film-making.

Now, there were some reputable and talented people competing with Moore. And I am certain he is not as skilled as everyone said. And several have commented that Moore looked frightened when he accepted the award.

Did he beg for the award for cover?

[proud American in Canada]

"In essence did one of Moore's adolescent approaches to "movie making" lead to the death of an American?"

Well said, and it sounds like the answer is yes.

It I hope investigations by proper authorities are underway as we speak.

This could be Michael Moore's undoing.

[Grampa Dave]

You posted:

"In essence did one of Moore's adolescent approaches to "movie making" lead to the death of an American?

The overriding material question remains: is Michael Moore complicit in the death of Nick Berg?"

I would go a step further. Moore is way beyond adolesccence. He is a 24/7/365 hate America, conservatives and GW. He would do anything to weaken American and defeat GW.

Like most of the elite limo liberals from Follywood and the east coast, he believes that the Islamofascists are his friends. He had/has no idea of how dangerous they are. He may realize that now, and he and Daddy Berg will do anything to blame GW and conservative Americans for Nick's murder.