One of the difficult things about following something like this is to not get ourselves bogged down with pre-conceived ideas. For example, on the e-mail I thought that it was odd that Berg had been intensely questioned by Israeli Internal Security. Another poster said that that is routine when entering Israel. So something that seemed sinister to me was, in fact, routine.
The other difficulty about this is that the media is cavalier with facts. Examples are the confusion about whether the e-mail was stolen or loaned, and whether or not there was a housing shortage at OU. Sometimes the press just makes stuff up, as we all know.
Anyway, we need to be careful as we proceed along this path and not let ourselves be led down fruitless paths because we are convinced our theory is right.
I do think the fact that Moore was silent about this until Salon tipped the public off, and that the parents and Moore are trying to keep the film to themselves is highly telling.
Also, I saw a picture of Nick Berg at some sort of conference and he was not wearing a suit. What I don't know is if that picture was taken at the meeting where the brother says he wore a suit, but I sure would like to find out.
AND, I also see that the brother says he wasn't really a Bush supporter!! So who is lying, the father or the brother?
Two different Israeli Security forces questioned him. I find that unusual.