Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Trinity_Tx
And I notice this Washington Post article doesn't mention email addresses being stolen, nor Ashcroft indicating that was the case:

Ashcroft Says No Link Between Berg and Terrorists

Excerpt:

Ashcroft was also asked about FBI questioning of Berg in 2002 after a computer password he had used in college turned up in the possession of Zacarias Moussaoui, an al Qaeda adherent who is currently awaiting trial in the United States on conspiracy charges related to the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Berg's family and U.S. officials said Berg had loaned his computer and e-mail address to a man he met while riding a bus to classes at the University of Oklahoma in 1999 and that the man turned out to be a terrorism suspect who was acquainted with Moussaoui.

"The suggestion that Mr. Berg was in some way involved in terrorist activity or may have been linked . . . is a suggestion that we do not have any ability to support and we do not believe is a valid one," Ashcroft said.

He discounted the significance of Berg's reported sharing of his e-mail address and the subsequent link to Moussaoui.

"We do not believe that reflects any association with terrorist objectives or activities," Ashcroft said. "It's not uncommon for individuals from time to time to allow computer use by other individuals in university settings."

Ashcroft said he did not know whether Berg ever knew Moussaoui, adding, "I do know that the matter was resolved, and it was resolved in a way that indicated that there was no inappropriate involvement in terror."

~snip~

1,212 posted on 05/29/2004 12:58:21 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1170 | View Replies ]


To: cyncooper
"And I notice this Washington Post article doesn't mention email addresses being stolen, nor Ashcroft indicating that was the case:"

Cyn, if you'll click the link I gave you with the cite, you will see that it goes to http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A28087-2004May14.html

Here is as much of the text as I dare post without messing with copyright - you can click the link for the rest.


FBI Questioned Berg on 9/11 Link
Suspect in Attacks Stole Computer ID From Iraq Victim
By Sewell Chan and Dan Eggen
Washington Post Foreign Service
Saturday, May 15, 2004; Page A17


BAGHDAD, May 14 -- Nicholas Berg, *snip* was interviewed by FBI agents in the United States in 2002 because of a tangential connection to the case of alleged al Qaeda member Zacarias Moussaoui, U.S. officials said Friday.

The link between Berg, whom FBI agents in Iraq questioned three times shortly before he disappeared, and Moussaoui, who is accused of conspiracy in the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, was confirmed by Attorney General John D. Ashcroft.

Ashcroft emphasized that FBI agents had cleared Berg of any suspicious activity. "We did not develop any interest in Mr. Berg or determine in any way that he had any relationship to any activities of terror," Ashcroft said in Washington.

"The suggestion that Mr. Berg was in some way involved in terrorist activity . . . is a suggestion that we do not have any ability to support and we do not believe is a valid one."

Moussaoui and an acquaintance used an e-mail address or other computer identification traced to Berg, Justice Department officials said. The FBI concluded that Berg had been one of numerous victims of scam artists who were stealing e-mail addresses and passwords at the main campus of the University of Oklahoma, where Berg had been a student, several officials said.

Berg, 26, never met Moussaoui, who attended the school later, officials said.


Ashcroft said the theft of Berg's e-mail address was unremarkable. "It is not uncommon for individuals from time to time to allow . . . computer use by other individuals in university settings," Ashcroft said.

*snip*

Eggen reported from Washington.
© 2004 The Washington Post Company




Now, I wasn't even going to answer your last, #1193, but now that I'm back in this for the moment... you said:
..."I was referring the Washington Post making a flat statement of what the FBI concluded.
...As to Nick's father, he was completely on the record now, not being anonymously quoted and not claiming faulty memory from two years ago. "

The Washington Post cite I gave you in that post just said the FBI concluded that Nick was among many who had their e-mail accounts stolen.
The article you challenged me to answer has Michael Berg saying the same thing:

"...amongst many other people's e-mail who he did the same thing to," Berg said."

So I'm at a loss for why you're still after me. lol
You started off accusing me of having no source. I gave it. Is it one source's word against the other? Yes.

I'm not here "zealously debunking a conspiracy". I'm answering questions directed to me since this afternoon.

I'm with you - we just want to focus on the best info we have available, and finding more. I have not decided one way or the other either. There is plenty of weirdness about this case even if Ashcroft is right.
1,214 posted on 05/29/2004 1:45:38 AM PDT by Trinity_Tx (Most of our so-called reasoning consists in finding arguments for going on believin as we already do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1212 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson