This is what makes no sense to me.
"then why announce it?" Is the same question I keep asking myself, also. And the only reason I can think of, is there's something in it for Michael, an alibi or cover-up perhaps, because he's afraid his connection with the prison photo's will ultimately be exposed. If my tinfoil hat fits, then it all makes sense, the photographs were posed and all taken on the same day, right? Michael Moore's MO is written all over the photographs. For example, the incident with the dog collar and leash, the man on the ground appears to be grimacing in pain, yet the leash is loose and hardly could have caused any pain. The photograph where the 'soldier' is 'punching' an iraqi lying on the ground, there is no sense of movement, the 'soldier' has his fist in the air...it's a posed position.
Who supplied the cameras? Who set up the shots? We know the motive was to discredit the US but we do not know the name of the 'director' do we? To me the whole thing looks like just another Michael Moore 'movie'.
Why was Berg wearing an orange prisoner jumpsuit? Why were the walls behind the killers the same colour as in the prison, as they appeared to be? Was the film of the 'beheading' staged, just like the photographs were?
What went wrong? I think Michael knows. And if he does, he is very very scared. Just my two cents worth...