Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: paulsy
This isn't the "father's" assets we're talking about--but the widow's and her children's assets. You're advocating taking the food out of their mouths, and abrogating the meaning of a legal family.

Fight on, widow. I hope you win, and go for atty's fees, too...

56 posted on 05/27/2004 12:13:23 PM PDT by Mamzelle (for a post-neo conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: Mamzelle

mamzelle I got it.

If 911 didnt happen Liam would have left his wife to marry his prenant mistress and paid alimony to his wife and child support to his 4 children....LOL..


I am not far off with my thoughts that Mz. Diaz consulted a lawyer who advised her to keep the child for monetary gain.

Unless of course lawyers suddenly got morals with 911.....






58 posted on 05/27/2004 12:17:01 PM PDT by alisasny (SMARTY JONES FOR SECRETARY OF OFFENSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: Mamzelle

I agree. It seems that the advent of DNA testing has made it easier for a woman having an adulterous affair with a married man to undermine the rights of his legal wife and children. I thought that marriage was a legal framework of protection for a woman and her children.
This woman should be granted nothing from the estate of the sperm donor. The estate should pass to the legal widow and legal children of the deceased.
I hope the widow and her children prevail.


64 posted on 05/27/2004 12:42:10 PM PDT by antceecee (God bless and shield our troops from harm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson