Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mamzelle; johnfrink
"I don't know the legal basis, but it sure isn't the first time I've seen a child born out of wedlock somehow sporting his sperm-donor's legal name."

Actually his mother can call him anything she wants, just as you or I could change our names to anything we want. It doesn't constitute any legal advantage to share last name with the presumed father.
42 posted on 05/27/2004 11:48:04 AM PDT by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: monday
So, we could name our kids Vanderbilt if we wanted? Why keep one's family name at all, when it comes down to it, just pick out any old last name that appeals to the caprice of the moment...

If I wanted to legally change my name, it'd take a little more than the will to do so.

Makes little sense. Why couldn't any woman with a paternity claim name her kid after the defending male, whether he did the "fathering", or not? It gives her quite a moral advantage until the DNA result comes in. Does the innocent male have any recourse, I wonder, at finding his name so used?

I guess you're saying that it is only convention, nothing legal, in "handing down a name."

43 posted on 05/27/2004 11:54:21 AM PDT by Mamzelle (for a post-neo conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson