Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RedBloodedAmerican; ECM; Enterprise; CrazyIvan; randog; COEXERJ145; Old Sarge; sergeantdave; ...
Here's a good thumbnail synopsis (I picked this up off the Web some time ago):

If a leader were to arise -- a man who was a vegetarian; a radical environmentalist; a tea-drinking, nature worshiping, anti-smoking fanatic; a socialist; a proponent of abortion and of medical research utilizing fetal tissue; a man who would outlaw speech and ideas that he didn't approve of; an animal rights activist; a controversial artist and writer; a pagan who's harshest rhetoric was directed against Jews and Christians -- he could rise quickly to the leadership of the Green Party. Indeed, such a man would find few critics among Democrats, and would be welcomed by the faculty of most colleges. Such a man did once exist, and did become the leader of a modern nation only a few decades ago. That man was Adolph Hitler.

51 posted on 05/27/2004 11:05:49 AM PDT by SpyGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SpyGuy

I'm going to have to register at DU just to post that on their site.


52 posted on 05/27/2004 11:16:09 AM PDT by stylin_geek (Koffi: 0, G.W. Bush: (I lost count))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: SpyGuy

Frightening. Could it happen?

Thank you, I'll save that one.


53 posted on 05/27/2004 11:17:13 AM PDT by Old Sarge (It's not Bush's fault - It's THE MEDIA'S fault!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: SpyGuy
The problem with that sort of list is that the items NOT on the list may be as important. That Hitler was a socialist should be recognized by all. That 'such a man would find few critics among Democrats' ignores the issue of the characteristics not listed. Saying, 'That man was Adolph Hitler' denies those unlisted characteristics even exist. Those are false arguments in the same way that pointing at some wheels and a muffler and saying, 'that is a Mercedes 500SL' is false.

On the other hand, it's enough in my mind to recognize that he was indeed a socialist. Though a simple list begs the question, it is still a fact - as Hayek showed - that socialists inevitably become the monsters that Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, and Mao became. So the rest of the list - all of it, including the things not in your excerpt - follows from that one characteristic of being a socialist.
54 posted on 05/27/2004 11:21:12 AM PDT by Gorjus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: SpyGuy

Great synopsis, a keeper. Thanks!


59 posted on 05/27/2004 3:03:07 PM PDT by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: SpyGuy
Yes, it really is shocking to tell a Lefty that. They just don't believe it.

Another neat thing about this paragraph that I've used with preachy vegetarians before when they try to beat you over the head with the morality of vegetarianism. I tell them "Hitler was a vegetarian and Jesus Christ ate meat". It kinda ruins their day.

60 posted on 05/27/2004 3:49:37 PM PDT by keithtoo (Please remove all Kerry-on luggage from your forehead compartments.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: SpyGuy

Great post!


64 posted on 05/28/2004 7:52:39 AM PDT by jcb8199
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson