Posted on 05/26/2004 6:12:52 PM PDT by CurlyDave
Crime laboratory evidence shows the 19-year-old woman who has accused Kobe Bryant (news) of rape had consensual sex with another man hours after she said the basketball star raped her, MSNBC reported on Wednesday.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
HELLO?????
She lied to the prosecutors; if she lied once, they can't believe another word she said.
BTW, for those keeping count, this makes at least two men besides Kobe that week.
Besides the fact that her injuries are a big part of the prosecutors case. All one has to ask, Did the injuries occur with Bryant, or the second man? Reasonable doubt. If she lied to the police, any testimony she makes, is under a cloud.
Was her rapist convicted?
And how will he get his reputation back?
33 posted on 05/26/2004 6:35:13 PM PDT by Howlin
___________________________________________________
LOL - what reputation - this guy is a scumbag even if he is innocent of rape. Fact is - had he not been cheating on his wife none of this would have happened.
I'm not so sure his reputation has been destroyed as much as his character has been revealed. At best, he is an adulterer and his loss of endorsements is simply a consequence of his immoral behavior.
After Kobe supposedly bruised her and caused her to bleed?
Only a nymphomaniac would behave as this woman has behaved.
All the rumors about her bipolar condition are obviously true.
The lying part comes in when she denied having sex after the alleged "rape," and when the prosecuters were led to believe that there was only semen testing DNA different than Bryant's on her UNDERWEAR, when in fact reported lab results are from samples taken from INSIDE her body.
Also, there is such a thing as "typical behaviors" of an abused victim. I know it's used in court in child sex abuse cases, and one can assume it may be used in rape cases. Victims of rape typically go home, take a scalding shower (emergency rooms also offer betadine douches which are eagerly accepted by women), and withdraw from the social scene for a while. Kobe's accuser, on the other hand, went out and had sex with someone. Very weird, and very untypical. That in itself might be brought out in court.
Well, his reputation as a faithful husband was justifiably exploded.
But his reputation as a gentleman incapable of rape, well, that was eclipsed for a while. If he gets it back, he will blaze a path for others sullied by false accusations.
All of which is assuming, as I am, that the charge is not legitimate.
How will he get his reputation back? All he lost was endorsements. His fans still adore him.
It keeps him from doing life in prison.
How many men of lesser means are doing time due to the accusations by trollops like this one?
He had a reputation he didn't deserve before...
Adultery is one thing.
Criminal assault is quite another.
If there's any credibility to this new evidence, I think they may have to. Obviously she didn't tell the police this prior to Kobe getting charged. The prosecution can't put her on the stand if they believe that she will lie. They could lose their law licenses if they tried. They have no case without her.
If I were the prosecutor, I'd ask for the charges to be dismissed. And if the girl's family complained publicly, I'd charge her with obstruction of justice and lying to the police.
I'm betting they all wish this thing had never happened.
A lot of men have been accused of rape after consensual sex leads to pregnancy. You don't have to be particularly rich for this to happen.
If it ever does happen to you, the rape shield laws prevent an effective defense.
Lets socialize lawyers. Let rich and poor alike get the luck of the draw. It's no different than the state assigning you a brain surgeon.
Twenty bucks?
The point is Kobe doesn't have to prove he didn't rape her; the prosecution has to prove he did. The rape charge rests on a "he said/she said" pivot. If she can be shown to have lied regarding sexual relations around the time the accusation was made, the prosecution cannot possibly demonstrate that rape occured "beyond a reasonable doubt."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.