Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michelle Malkin - The skanks on Capitol Hill
townhall.com ^ | 5/26/04 | Michelle Malkin

Posted on 05/25/2004 10:22:49 PM PDT by kattracks

Meet the new Monica Lewinsky. Jessica Cutler, a 24-year-old mailroom clerk and phone receptionist, worked for Sen. Mike DeWine, R-Ohio, until last Friday -- when he fired her for using Senate computers to post to an Internet Web log that chronicled her trysts with six different men in Washington. Cutler's partners reportedly included government officials who gave her money for her sexual services.

 Diary excerpt: "I just took a long lunch with F and made a quick $400. When I returned to the office, I heard that my boss was asking about my whereabouts. Loser." In another entry, Cutler explains: "F(equals)Married man who pays me for sex. Chief of Staff at one of the gov agencies, appointed by Bush."

 Cutler, who aspired to be a journalist, spouted: "I'm sure I am not the only one who makes money on the side this way: How can anybody live on $25K/year??" When I was 24 and making less than that, I did it by eating Spaghetti-O's, Ramen noodles and Swanson pot pies for dinner; driving a Toyota Tercel with no air conditioning; and sleeping on a $30 futon. I did it the way most parents teach their daughters to succeed: through hard work, thrift, faith and perseverance.

 I don't usually write about such inside-the-Beltway gossip, but Cutler's indecent conduct, glib rationalizations and in-your-face shamelessness, and the accompanying feeding frenzy over her, deserve a firm outside-the-Beltway lashing. This vulgar little episode reflects a larger, disturbing media trend toward normalizing and glamorizing sexual promiscuity among young working women. It harms those trying to succeed on their merits in the professional arena.

 And it also harms our own daughters, who will be forced to fight harder to protect their dignity and credibility in a "Girls Gone Wild" culture.

 The Pulitzer Prize-winning Washington Post featured Cutler, who dubbed herself and her online diary "Washingtonienne," in a prominent story last Sunday headlined "The Hill's Sex Diarist Reveals All (Well, Some)." Cutler posed for a fetching photo and supplied juicy soundbites. "It's so cliched. It's like, 'There's a slutty girl on the Hill?' There's millions of 'em," Cutler told the Washington Post's Richard Leiby. Millions? Follow-up dispatches appeared in Roll Call, the New York Post, the London Independent, United Press International and the Associated Press, whose wire reports on Cutler were reprinted everywhere from the Akron Beacon Journal to the Houston Chronicle to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.

 The news media originally caught whiff of Cutler from an online D.C.-based gossip site, Wonkette.com, authored by "edgy" (read: profanity-laced and sex-obsessed) writer Ana Marie Cox, who herself has been recently touted extensively by adoring media fans. CNN terrorism analyst Peter Bergen hosted a tony party for Cox last month; Washington Post reporter Howard Kurtz invited her on his CNN show, where she boasted, "I'm the expert at talking dirty."

 Cutler and Cox, 31, appeared together on Fox News Channel this week, where they giggled and guffawed and rolled their eyes as they reveled in their sleazy celebrity. When Fox anchor Brigitte Quinn (who deserves a medal for her restraint) asked Cutler whether her parents knew about her raunchy sex life, she snorted: "They do now!" Cox cackled and went on to coo about Cutler's writing talent and future book publishing prospects. Cox generously mentioned she didn't want too much "credit" for Cutler's newfound notoriety. ("Credit?" Quinn mused subtly. "That's an interesting word.")

 This female Beavis and Butthead duo illustrate what normal Americans hate about the Capitol scene: narcissism, moral bankruptcy and self-congratulatory media-political incest. The Washington Post's legitimization of this shallow "story" illustrates something else: the mainstream media's perverted moral values. The paper's recent profiles and features of social conservatives drip with condescension and ridicule. Religious activists are portrayed as intolerant homophobes; Republicans as gun-toting rubes; abstinence promoters as freaks.

 But give The Washington Post two vain, young, trash-mouthed skanks who couldn't care less about what their parents think of their sex-drenched infamy, and the newspaper can't wait to help make them full-fledged members of the media elite.

 Cutler and Cox apparently have no trouble looking at themselves in the mirror every morning. I pity the mainstream journalists-turned-pimps who can do the same.

©2004 Creators Syndicate, Inc.

Contact Michelle Malkin | Read Malkin's biography



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: capitolhillskanks; jessicacutler; malkin; michellemalkin; washingtonienne; wonkette
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 201-207 next last
To: nopardons

This is what happens when Wonkette buys Washingtonienne "a" drink at 6PM: We didn't get home until 1AM. The evening began at the Four Seasons and ended in a suburban Virginia farmhouse. We did not, in the end, have to buy any of our own drinks. Pictures were taken. A cell phone was lost. This morning, Mr. Wonkette made us scrambled eggs. Now, can we move on?

61 posted on 05/26/2004 12:36:22 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: ccmay

That made me sick just to think about it. She sure doesn't think much of herself.


62 posted on 05/26/2004 12:39:46 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: bonfire
She's a disgusting person;I fon't have to read her garbage to know that.

Quick...go wash!

You're moving?

63 posted on 05/26/2004 12:39:48 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
You throw around the word "skank" as if it were the most vile epithet in the English language.

The accepted definition of this word-in adjectival form-according to Webster's New World College Dictionary is:

[slang] sleazy, offensive, disreputable, etc. in appearance or character.

Now, I have no problem slamming someone because of a deficiency of character-which appears to be the case with this woman-but I think that it's pretty reprehensible to launch a personal attack against someone based solely upon their appearance.

64 posted on 05/26/2004 12:41:36 AM PDT by The Scourge of Yazid ("Why don't we just ask Gerard? Gerard knows everything.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
One married slut,who accepts free drinks from stranges and one self proclaimed whore,out for a night on the town together?

Neither of them are attractive and both look three sheets to the wind.

65 posted on 05/26/2004 12:42:22 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: ItsonlikeDonkeyKong
but I think that it's pretty reprehensible to launch a personal attack against someone based solely upon their appearance.

Did you miss the title of this thread?

66 posted on 05/26/2004 12:43:07 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: ItsonlikeDonkeyKong
Read the defintion you posted.It says quite plainly,"......in appearance OR character. <~p> And FWIW,her "appearence" (her manner of dress)IS sleazy.
67 posted on 05/26/2004 12:48:57 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: nopardons; Howlin
And yet, almost all of the posts you've made on this subject have been accompanied by pictures of the 'skank' in question.

I suggest that you two read my post.

I never suggested that this woman was Scarlett O'Hara when it comes to the formalized rituals of courtship.

However, I also don't quite understand the uproar over a story-that may or may not be true-but that is in any case, not the most pressing item on the agenda of Capitol Hill lawmakers.

68 posted on 05/26/2004 12:55:03 AM PDT by The Scourge of Yazid ("Why don't we just ask Gerard? Gerard knows everything.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: ItsonlikeDonkeyKong
I am REPEATING the title of this article, brainiac. Maybe you should read it. I will call her exactly what I think she is, a SLUT (without your permission, no less)!
69 posted on 05/26/2004 12:58:21 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
We're talking air-head skanks here. Math is NOT their strong suite.

What is really sad is that they (Culter and Cox) don't realize that one day they'll be 40 and not quite as attractive to the men as they used to be. Then they'll be looking for a deeper, more emotional love; and they won't find it. Both of them will end up in therapy, I guarentee. No man respects a woman with such a past, esp. one who can't keep her mouth shut about past lovers.

70 posted on 05/26/2004 12:58:28 AM PDT by Clock King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Obviously he/she didn't. I just love having people "scold" me. lol!
71 posted on 05/26/2004 12:59:59 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: ItsonlikeDonkeyKong

So stop reading it if your time is so valuable. I don't recall anyone forcing you on this thread to read such "horrible" name calling.


72 posted on 05/26/2004 1:01:55 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: ItsonlikeDonkeyKong

SKANK, SKANK, SKANK. They are both SKANKS, SLUTS, WHORES & SLEAZY TRASH!


73 posted on 05/26/2004 1:03:40 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
In truth, what I don't get is why any man worth his salt has would even consider paying for sex. In my distant less-than-immaculate past, it simply wasn't that hard to find relatively nice girls I knew well who would consider a dalliance or two. Paying a useless skank like this for sex is mindboggling to me, never mind the obvious consequences.

I can accept that people do it -- that doesn't really bother me -- but I don't understand WHY they do it. I can't imagine running my life that way.

74 posted on 05/26/2004 1:04:07 AM PDT by tortoise (All these moments lost in time, like tears in the rain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ItsonlikeDonkeyKong
I suggest that you go look at every single reply I have made to this thread. NOT A SINGLE ONE HAS A PICTURE,OR EVEN a RED X WHERE A PICTURE SHOULD BE,ON IT !

The females in question,and one in particular,write about sex in D.C.,in detail.The whore used to be a clerk in a GOPer's office and claims that she is being PAID FOR SEX,by GOPers,high in the president's team.In case you are having problems analyzing just what this means,it is yet another way to bring down the president/smear him And ALL GOPers, with the Clintonian "they all do it,but GOPers have to pay for it" brush.

Unlike you,I read your post and understood what you thought you meant to say ,but didn't.

If you don't want to worry about this,get off the thread...don't come on it to jump all over a few of us.

75 posted on 05/26/2004 1:07:01 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

That poaster has MISSED everything...the article, the title of the article,as well as what has appeared on which replies and by whom.


76 posted on 05/26/2004 1:08:33 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

Yep,especially newbies,who haven't even been here a month and have REALLY weird personal pages to boot.Go take a look at his. Sheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeesh.


77 posted on 05/26/2004 1:12:48 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2

They were really disgusting. I don't know if you took a look at the blog itself. It's hard to think such shallow people exist.

It's all about very empty seeming sex, getting drunk, movies, getting money, and nasty snide comments about people. She seems to think its very funny that she is sleeping regularly with six guys, and then laughing at them behing their backs. Very unpleasant.

I do call that clueless. She has no concept of what life should be.

But when I wrote that post, I was really commenting on that she didn't seem to understand that Brigit was criticizing her lifestyle.


78 posted on 05/26/2004 1:28:36 AM PDT by I still care
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

*** As Howlin precisely pointed out, she committed a felony. Pretty dumb on her part to admit it so publicly wasn't it. ***

You should live long enough to see that law enforced .. it's not like she smoked in a bar or some other serious crime ;)


79 posted on 05/26/2004 1:28:56 AM PDT by EDINVA (reporters aren't stupid .. they just think YOU are)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth

Ick. That news clip was like watching "The Brady Bunch goes to Las Vegas". What a couple of degenerates-- apparently the shame of a lifestyle like that escapes them.


80 posted on 05/26/2004 2:59:55 AM PDT by ovrtaxt (Stop the war. ********** NUKE EM NOW !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 201-207 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson