You refused to answer my question attempting to clarify this, and now your repeat your mischaracterization of your opposition. Thats dishonest.
You refuse to acknowledge that there is a difference between Marines finding an innovative solution to exit from a flawed cease fire force on them and this being the Marines choice. They were not given the option of defeating the city with the training and with the weapons they brought.
I think this is a dishonorable debate on your part.
You can think what you want. It's clear from the article that the suggestions went from Fallujah to Washington, not vice versa.
Still avoiding discussing anything that I did say LS, just making more things up to argue with... ;^)