Nope. That's just your spin. You obviously prefer to label the guy rather than address the substance of his comments. Suit yourself. Maybe the leftists can help you perfect this tactic. They *are* the masters.
Wrong again: ZINNI'S spin.
This isn't rocket science, surely. You've been "called" on the airy insubstantiality of your bluffed "rebuttal": namely, that the whole ramshackle thing rests, shakily, on the completely unproven by you wish/assumption -- bloviated as fact -- that 60 Minutes is (for some unspoken reason) lying about Zinni's comments; and that Zinni (again: no coherent explanation offered) is perfectly happy to allow them to do so, no matter what the cost to what we'll charitably refer to as His Good Name.
Can't offer even so much as a gnat's eyelash worth of hard, factual evidence in support of your dubious claims? **Yawn.** You're not the first to try your hand at such peddling, hereabouts; and I doubt very much you'll be the last.
You're just the one I happened to out-and-out bust doing it, is all.