"Uh," youself. You just now finished hopping up and down like a spider monkey, shrilling that we take the 60 Minutes story YOU cited as stone gospel... and NOW, not even half an hour later, you're waving away the damning parts as just being "a transcript of a TV piuece."
Weak, weak, weak. Give me a real fight, or quit wasting my time.
That was a voice over. He probably didn't hear it until it was aired.
You have no basis whatsoever for advanicing that claim. We know, from past accountings of the Clintons and other reliably conservative-bashing guests on said show, that 60 Minues DOES, in fact, occasionally offer their willing interview subjects a chance to "vet" their filmed interviews, prior to broadcast. That attempt at supporting argument is flimsier than a soap bubble, and as substantive as a Big Mac.
Did you even watch this on Sunday?
As it so happens, I did. What of it? Again: I'm responding solely to the text YOU cited in (failed) support of your splay-legged argument. ALL of it is fair game, kiddo; like it or not.
And I rather suspect it's "not."