To: Brilliant
I'll be very surprised if this suit isn't immediately thrown out. I don't think you can get married and then sue as a spouse for a tortious act that took place BEFORE you were married.
As I said to hubby yesterday, I'm not sure the advance of civilization has been a good thing. I read articles like this and I am convinced the world would be a better place if most people were still out tilling the ground for their sustanence.
3 posted on
05/22/2004 8:09:48 AM PDT by
jocon307
(The dems don't get it, the American people do.)
To: jocon307
The article discusses that. You've got to remember, though, that this is Massachusetts we're talking about. I'd be surprised if they throw it out.
5 posted on
05/22/2004 8:11:12 AM PDT by
Brilliant
To: jocon307
I'll be very surprised if this suit isn't immediately thrown out. Nothing that happens with judges and lawyers surprises me anymore.
8 posted on
05/22/2004 8:12:45 AM PDT by
Samwise
(The new media motto: All the news that fits our agenda.)
To: jocon307
You think the same courts that allow homos unions would toss out this case? Not likely.
To: jocon307
.......I read articles like this and I am convinced the world would be a better place if most people were still out tilling the ground for their sustanence. I must agree.
59 posted on
05/23/2004 7:24:54 AM PDT by
Fiddlstix
(This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
To: jocon307
I'll be very surprised if this suit isn't immediately thrown out. I don't think you can get married and then sue as a spouse for a tortious act that took place BEFORE you were married. Don't forget, we are talking about Massachusetts.
60 posted on
05/23/2004 11:00:17 AM PDT by
L.N. Smithee
(Just because I don't think like you doesn't mean I don't think for myself)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson