[Cobra Scott]

So all you've done is present evidence that both the flora and the fauna of this microcosm has actually had to evolve (via natural selection) to weather these climate changes that you insist on. Unless these changes and their effects are not the only viable scenario...

[anguish]

Doh,

Of course he means that since evolution is false (the premise), the ice-ages make evolution false.. oh wait.. nevermind -.-

[Truth666]

Before I answer the open (correct) question of possiblity of the reef forming in the last 10,000 years from dirtboy, #28, I will answer quickly the incorrect questions / statements addressed directly to me.
So all you've done is present evidence that both the flora and the fauna of this microcosm has actually had to evolve (via natural selection) to weather these climate changes that you insist on. Unless these changes and their effects are not the only viable scenario...
Wrong. Again I presented what the title of this thread says, and in the process of answering the refutation I also proved evolution to be impossible - but that's just a side effect.
It's well know : the bigger the lie the easier it is to expose it. No wonder that a discussion where evolution is present at some part must lead to exposing it as a lie in short time.