"Rule by the United Nations"? No, more like "rule with the United Nations". That's the difference between working for other countries and working together with other countries. What makes you think Soros wants the U.S. to be like a slave-state to the UN (or whatever it is you're picturing)?
Don't you agree that the UN is broke beyond repair and should be abandoned by the US?!
Um, no. Why should I think the UN is "broken"? It only fails to work when we abandon it.
The UN's done a lot of great things since it's inception, you know. It's promoted free elections and democracy in lots of third-world countries that otherwise wouldn't have had the chance to have them. It helped end apartheid in South Africa. It's saved millions of children's lives through UNICEF. And that's just for starters.
So you would disband the UN because...?
We could start a new "LeagueOfFReeNations" and no longer be subject to the whims of an organization that is dominated by representatives from dictatorships.
Reminds me of a funny piece I read in The Onion last year, where Bush founded the U.S.U.N., a United Nations where only countries that agreed with us were allowed in, and we just decided to invade the rest.
In ten years time, it might not be so funny though. =(
The UN is counter-productive to achieving LIBERTY and self-determination throughout the World...MUD