This is the part I do not get. Were we not saying that Saddam had not provided proof he had destroyed the stocks he had and we wanted those destroyed??? Not to mention that he was possibly making new because he had the knowledge and had kicked inspectors out.
Looks to me we are proven right because even if this is old it was part of that stockpile we were saying he had not destroyed. So why is the time this manufactured important? I guess it would make it extreamly interesting if it were new, but it is still a WMD and in Iraq.
Think how the Left will spin it.
If we have it from the 2001-2003 timeframe, it's a lot more bulletproof that it would be f this were made in 1990.
--
What is really interesting is that some of the WMDs may have been hidden in plain sight.