To: liz44040
Fox is saying it is likely that this is one of the shells from a batch that Saddam was known to have but refused to disclose.
Where there is one, there will be more.
One of the curious things said by the reporter is that the shell may not have been marked. In the same news blurb, the Gen Kimmit says he has never seen so much ammo in his life. Says it will take years to dispose of it. So you have to wonder, did the Saddam regime hide chemical WMD shells in plain sight, marked as common shells located in common ammo dumps? Makes you go ...hmmm doesn't it.
341 posted on
05/17/2004 9:18:15 AM PDT by
snooker
(John F'n Kerry, the enemy's choice in Vietnam, the enemy's choice in Iraq.)
To: snooker
So you have to wonder, did the Saddam regime hide chemical WMD shells in plain sight, marked as common shells located in common ammo dumps?
If he did, they'd damn well be careful about what they're blowing up in those controlled demolitions.
349 posted on
05/17/2004 9:24:28 AM PDT by
johnb838
(When I hear "Allahu Akhbar" it means somebody is about to die.)
To: snooker
One of the curious things said by the reporter is that the shell may not have been marked. In the same news blurb, the Gen Kimmit says he has never seen so much ammo in his life. Says it will take years to dispose of it. So you have to wonder, did the Saddam regime hide chemical WMD shells in plain sight, marked as common shells located in common ammo dumps? Makes you go ...hmmm doesn't it.Makes me go, uh oh! Good for Fox btw, for having the guts to report this.
449 posted on
05/17/2004 10:35:55 AM PDT by
TheSpottedOwl
(Torrance Ca....land of the flying monkeys)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson