Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Paladin2
A brief reading of OS history has VMS having relatively common roots with Unix. You can look it up.

I don't know about VMS having a lot in common with Unix.

But Windows NT (and therefore 2000, XP, and 2003) has some common roots with VMS.

The architect of Windows NT was Dave Cutler, who happens to also be the architect of VMS. Gates hired Cutler after he left DEC. There used to be a book available on Windows NT internals that points out the things the two OS's have in common.

Here's an article about the history.

157 posted on 05/17/2004 8:15:14 PM PDT by Mannaggia l'America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]


To: Mannaggia l'America

NT and its descendants to this day have been what I call VMS in a hurry! No command line interface (MS DOS? You've got to be kidding), no multi-version file system, no batch processing ability, no multi-user access and so on. Bring back VMS, please!


160 posted on 05/17/2004 8:21:17 PM PDT by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]

To: Mannaggia l'America; Paladin2

NT stole liberally from IBM's OS/2. And that is largely what it was crafted on. Whatever else they did to attempt to model other parts after VMS isn't surprising; but, I wouldn't say it's based on VMS.


161 posted on 05/17/2004 8:25:20 PM PDT by Havoc ("The line must be drawn here. This far and no further!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson