[Jill St Claire]

Quix, I agree with what you said, all I am saying is that reveal the sources or state that it is speculation, assumption, or what one believes based on their life experience.

To say there is a specific threat to a particular entity is not credible to me based on assumption, opinion, or speculation ESPECIALLY if one states those assumptions, etc., as being factual.

There are enough threats going on out there that we do not need someone to throw in more than what there is just to get hits on their sites.

I have a problem with someones integrity and credibility when greed overrides the truth where lives, or peoples livelihoods are involved! If the truth is not good enough, then one needs not say anything, at least IMHO!

[Quix]

I certainly agree with all your points.

Thanks.