[jla]

You're saying that absolutely no animal apart from humans experiences pleasure from sexual activity?

I did not, as you are well aware, say "no animal". I was referring to those anomalies in the animal/plant kingdom that might have a biological disposition towards same-sex mating, of which none are mammals, and the mating is done strictly for propagation, not for any sexual pleasure.

Moreover, what does this have to do with the claim that "homosexuality is not natural".

It's not natural in human beings. If it were then you'll have to explain how you folks intend on propagating...within your own means, i.e., without borrowing from the heterosexuals.

[Dimensio]

I was referring to those anomalies in the animal/plant kingdom that might have a biological disposition towards same-sex mating, of which none are mammals, and the mating is done strictly for propagation, not for any sexual pleasure.

I think that I'm confused between your claims and the claims of others.

Are you saying that no mammals engage in same-sex sexual activity, or that none do it for pleasure?

It's not natural in human beings.

It occurs in human beings, therefore it is natural in human beings. Once again, this has no bearing on its moral value -- the morality of an action or condition has no bearing on whether or not it is "natural". If you disagree, then explain your definition of "natural".

If it were then you'll have to explain how you folks intend on propagating...within your own means, i.e., without borrowing from the heterosexuals.

1) I have never stated that I am homosexual. In fact, I am not.

2) What does propogating have to do with whether or not something is natural?