Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: don-o
"So, we can defer to Jim Rob's vision since he's running it, but what that vision should be should be asked in terms of what is best for the whole FR community here." "Why?"

Isnt it obvious? If the interests of the whole FR community arent considered, the website would suffer. The point I am making is that even if Jim Rob is running this website, this is bigger than one person.

I think it has been made clear that, for example, banning trolls that disrupt rather than inform is one way to make this a better experience for the whole community.

111 posted on 05/16/2004 1:54:32 PM PDT by WOSG (http://freedomstruth.blogspot.com - I salute our brave fallen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]


To: WOSG
If the interests of the whole FR community arent considered, the website would suffer. The point I am making is that even if Jim Rob is running this website, this is bigger than one person.

A Private enterprise should be run by those who own the private enterprise. In this case it is Jim Robinson.

The so-called "FR community" is free to shop around on the internet and find a different website if they don't like the policies of this website and its ownership.

The interests of the "FR community" are best served in the free market place of competing websites -- each webiste no bigger than the people who own it.

Anything else is simply communalism.

441 posted on 05/16/2004 8:43:59 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson