Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LindaSOG; MediaMole
"Stay with them there clients - this thing will take a while to solve and in the meantime, the rent still has to be paid."

A "fiscal conservative," eh? {g}

"A little more for your consideration, and I really do want to hear your take on this stuff, please."

First off, I found your observations concerning the volume of blood that wasn't present troubling because you're absolutely correct.
The stuff should've been spraying around everywhere, at least throughout the first half of his murder.
Yet, it wasn't, just a neat little puddle.

"The miscellaneous and ridiculous conspiracy theories:
Conspiracy One: An unnamed "intelligence" source has info that the beheading was really done by Mossad using "Yemeni Jews" who look like arabs in order to generate hatred against the peaceful people of islam.
The Yemeni Jews who look like arabs were critical to the deception since all we can see of the murderers is their hands. Hands... oh yeah, about those hands..."

Sorry, no dice.
Just sounds like Liberal-Socialist inspired baloney to me.
The identity of the murderers will become known soon enough.
We're being told one of the voices has already been discovered to be an a-Q bigshot, presumably using voice prints?

"Conspiracy Two: The CIA really did it in order to generate hatred against the peaceful people of islam. Oh and also to deflect interest in the prison abuse scandal. The murderer's hands are too white, they look too fat and well fed to be arabs."

The "Peaceful people of Islam," huh.
Oy vey, Linda.
White hands & fat (too) well-fed Arabs?
Next...

"Conspiracy Three: The victim was killed in the prison by evil American GIs. The victim was wearing an orange jumpsuit just like the ones used in the prison."

Fine, great.
And their motive for killing the guy was?
Next...

"Funny thing about that orange jumpsuit. When he was found on that bridge, he was dressed in civilian clothes, all buttoned up and zipped up in the right places. I have to check that photo again. See if the body had shoes on when it was found, I don't remember and the picture is at home."

Do a search on poster "Mediamole" & read what this individual had to say about the [bridge] photo, OK?
Would like to hear your take, afterwards.

"Why take the presumably bloody jumpsuit off a corpse and dress him again? Especially when he was already filmed wearing the damn thing?"

Assumes he was in-fact not found wearing the thing, though.
That has yet to be proven (to my satisfaction) unless, you know something I/we don't, in which case speak up!

"Perhaps so the jumpsuit can be returned to the wardrobe dept for the next film?"

HA!!

...one just never knows about these things, do they.

166 posted on 05/14/2004 12:06:42 PM PDT by Landru (Indulgences: 2 for a buck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]


To: Landru
This is the image that is NOT of Berg. It is from 2003 during the initial combat phase of the war.

Whatever Berg was doing in Iraq. He was murdered in the most horrific fashion imaginable by those things. We should not lose sight of that, even if we question his motives for going to Iraq.

194 posted on 05/14/2004 2:14:13 PM PDT by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson