You know NOTHING more than the rest of us.....PERIOD! You are HOPING that he was better than his father,but you have NO idea if he was.
And you do?
You can't even quote the man's father right. How can we trust any of your conclusions?
The fact is, as of THIS point, you have no evidence for your presumption of his guilt.
Come on, you're even talking about intercepting radio transmissions? You're speculating worse than DU about this guy and why?
Mainly because his dad's a leftist and an email account. That's it.
No, I know a lot more than you do. I have done the research. All you have done is assume this guy is a traitor and look for specualative innuendo to prove it. I know this guy's dad is a traitorous commie. There is no evidence to suggest that "like father, like son." Unlike you I'm not going to manufacture it.
I started out this thread, like you and everyone else, thinking that Nick Berg was dirty, that there were too many "coincidences" in conjunction with his death. I found no evidence to suggest that he was dirty. What I found was that he was well respected in his field and was a go getter and an all american entrpenuer. That is where the evidence led me. You have no evidence to counter it. So don't tell me you know as much as I do. You don't.
When you produce some solid evidence that Nick Berg was dirty, I will look at it. Unlike you I have an open mind. If you don't believe it, then follow my posts on these threads and see where I was yesterday and where I am now on this subject.
But don't go off sullying the name of a man who can no longer defend it. The only thing protecting Nick Berg's good name is the evidence that he was a good guy. I find no evidence to contradict that. And you have no evidence either.