[general_re]

"Stumble"? Do you have anything to support that characterization, other than your own fevered imagination? Because it sure looks like the result of a deliberate investigation to me. And when exactly was the 5a gene in the winter flounder first described, anyway? Do you even know what the rationale was in calling them pseudogenes in the first place, or are you comfortable - as apparently you are - in inventing your contention that it was simply assumed to be a pseudogene by the original investigators? Did you even bother looking up the work of the people who first described 5a, or does that crystal ball of yours obviate such mundane gruntwork?

[PatrickHenry]

... other than your own fevered imagination?

How can you be so blind to the flood of new pharmaceuticals, medical techniques, cures, and agricultural enhancements flowing from the productive minds of creation scientists?