*snipped from: Nature 429, 153 (13 May 2004); doi:10.1038/429153a*
The two proteins differ slightly in their amino-terminal sequence and amino-acid composition. At the time of its discovery, the 5a gene was dismissed as an antifreeze-protein pseudogene, largely because the protein it encodes would have been grossly different from type I AFP and had never been detected in the flounderSo that is proof that scientists have been doing science wrong:
It proves that evolutionists and researchers have severely underestimated the complexity and incredible design of humans and animals for a long time now. If they would have approached their research with a different perspective, who knows what they may have discovered by now. Cures for diseases, etc.
Acceptance of literal Genesis by Marshall and Fletcher would have led them straight to this elusive protein? How?