[RightWhale]

You could have a single person publish three papers in one year and comletely overturn physics and never publish again. Could happen. Could be another publish a paper a month for 40 years and not have a fundamental effect, and yet be well thought of and used as reference countless times. We like to reference Science articles here, and a lot of them are speculative and not publishable in the better journals. There is the matter of the degree of quality of the paper, not all are the same level. The one at the head of this thread does not appear to be of the highest quality, but it still might be useful in an Ann Landers "Advice to Budding Scientists" kind of way.

[Nataku X]

This article is a layman's article, written for a general audience, and it was never intended to be a peer-reviewed article.