To: Junior
Of course, they usually change the subject as soon as they are shown the error of their ways...
Nah. They just deny that it was ever a prediction of evolution until after it was discovered. They're tricky like that.
16 posted on
05/13/2004 1:39:12 PM PDT by
Dimensio
(Join the Monthly Internet Flash Mob: http://tinyurl.com/3xj9m)
To: Dimensio; Junior
they found that its protein shell was similar to a bacterial virus and an animal virus. Don't viruses need a plant or animal host in which to replicate? Since viruses are just little packages of DNA or RNA and require a living host to infest and use that host as a source for amino acids --- because viruses have no cytoplasm or way to get amino acids on their own --- and this virus shows similarity to bacterial and animal viruses --- how can a virus come before other forms of life?
25 posted on
05/13/2004 2:16:22 PM PDT by
FITZ
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson