Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CathyRyan
I knew age was an issue surrounding their marriage.

I'm always surprised that people who have to produce an heir marry women in their 30's. On the other hand, Prince Charles married a young woman, and look how that turned out! I've had 3 children since I was 32, so maybe this couple will, too. They certainly look nice!

21 posted on 05/13/2004 11:51:59 AM PDT by Tax-chick (I can see you, but you can't see me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Tax-chick
Three???

I thought you only had two.

23 posted on 05/13/2004 12:01:33 PM PDT by carton253 (Re: The War on Terror. It's time to draw our swords and throw away the scabbards.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: Tax-chick
Diana lived up to her part of the deal producing the (heir and spare) but Diana never got her happily ever after. Chuck was the one that welshed on the deal (and he is the heir to the head of the church who's vows he could not live up to....if nothing else he should have kept his pants zipped no matter how bad it was). I believe that Diana truly had issues and needed serious help but purely for the royals needs I think they should have kept Diana in cotton wool until she was needed in public again. Diana was the best thing to happen to the royal family but the royal family was just to stupid to know what they had on their hands. Chuck is the British equivalent of Jean F'n Kerry.
25 posted on 05/13/2004 1:34:14 PM PDT by CathyRyan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson