Skip to comments.
Infrared picks up invisible UFOs
worldnetdaily.com ^
| 5/12/2004
| worldnetdaily.com
Posted on 05/12/2004 2:52:36 AM PDT by ovrtaxt
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-147 last
To: Quix
Occam's razor doesn't always work. Thomas Jefferson is famously quoted as saying, "Gentlemen, I would rather believe that two Yankee professors would lie than believe that stones fall from heaven."
These days belief in meteors is taken for granted. I'm still way over on the skeptic side of the UFO debate, however. You're entitled to your own facts.
Comment #142 Removed by Moderator
To: endthematrix
The "Iron Mountain" title rings a bell but I have no associations to go with it.
Could you refresh my memory or give me a link, please?
Thanks.
143
posted on
05/14/2004 4:31:58 AM PDT
by
Quix
(Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
To: Quix
Should the United States be forced to abandon its "war system," the Report speculated on potential corrective national policies -- "substitutes for the functions of war." The Iron Mountain antidote to peace, should it somehow break out, is to manufacture "alternate enemies" to maintain a siege mentality among Americans, leaving them open to continued social engineering by U.S. elites.
The Report posits sinister schemes to mobilize the masses in the absence of war, such as the creation of "an extraterrestrial menace," "massive global environmental pollution," or "an omnipresent, virtually omnipotent international police force." In the event popular passions are not sufficiently inflamed by these new enemies, the Report suggests instituting "a modern, sophisticated form of slavery," or perhaps "socially oriented blood games," organized "in the manner of the Spanish Inquisition and the witch trials of other periods."
144
posted on
05/14/2004 8:46:26 PM PDT
by
endthematrix
(To enter my lane you must use your turn signal!)
To: endthematrix
WOW.
So, is the book against the stuff, an expose or supporting such?
I couldn't tell.
Thanks.
145
posted on
05/14/2004 8:58:17 PM PDT
by
Quix
(Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
To: Quix
http://www.simonsays.com/titles/068482390X/
It was a report in the late sixties by a left wing think tank. It was exposed (or released) and today to discredit their own methods and preserve the authors credibility it is deemed a hoax. I don't believe it. The players involved have dubious political ties and it doesn't phase me that ideas like this would have been stated. More serious methods for global control come straight from the UN today.
146
posted on
05/14/2004 11:25:34 PM PDT
by
endthematrix
(To enter my lane you must use your turn signal!)
To: endthematrix
True, they are fairly blatant these days. But they've always been blatant to some degree if you knew which of their documents to look in.
Galbraith had to have been a member of the puppet masters early on. What better way to throw people off than to state the truth as a hoax, a laughable satire?
147
posted on
05/15/2004 5:36:58 AM PDT
by
Quix
(Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-147 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson