To: wjersey
Why is it OK for Bill to try and stick to Bush (43) every chance he gets when Bush (41) remained silent about him?
9 posted on
05/11/2004 6:32:24 PM PDT by
wjersey
To: wjersey
No worries. Every time Clinton opens his yap, he reminds the country of the difference between himself and a leader. It only helps Bush when Clinton talks.
20 posted on
05/11/2004 6:35:25 PM PDT by
Pukin Dog
(Sans Reproache)
To: wjersey
It's called CLASS, wjersey.
66 posted on
05/11/2004 6:52:20 PM PDT by
Dawgreg
(Happiness is not having what you want, but wanting what you have.)
To: wjersey
Why is it OK for Bill to try and stick to Bush (43) every chance he gets when Bush (41) remained silent about him?Hillarie's unethical review/possible copying of 700+ FBI files?
99 posted on
05/11/2004 7:12:25 PM PDT by
FreeAtlanta
(never surrender, this is for the kids)
To: wjersey
Why is it OK for Bill to try and stick to Bush (43) every chance he gets when Bush (41) remained silent about him? Funny thing, that. There's always been a convention that ex-presidents keep shut up about their successors. Clinton, on the other hand, has made himself the Second-Guesser In Chief. Even the comically inept Jimmy Carter occasionally gets into the act.
That convention - letting the next guy get on with it in peace - is a classy custom. Seems like the Rats have decided to eschew class for political advantage.
Clinton has set another precedent: he's the first man ever to be unfit to be ex-president.
177 posted on
05/11/2004 8:54:07 PM PDT by
Starve The Beast
(I used to be disgusted, but now I try to be amused)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson