[graf008]

This really isn't a bad thing what he is saying...I know we don't like him as a messanger - but I agree entirely.

The most savage acts of violence in Iraq are not committed currently by the remnants of the Republican Gurad, but by groups associated with Osama bin Laden.

History might judge this different, but I wish the Administration had gone after bin Laden with all guns blaring and not stopped until they found him and completed destroyed his network - if that meant we had to occupy every country in the Middle East. The Administration shifted targets and diverted away from a bigger goal.

Who cares what Clinton did, as the decision to divert more energy to Saddam was made in this admin. But I do recall Clinton actually agreeing with the war in Iraq.

[swheats]

I believe bin Laden is dead. Anytime now he could have proven being alive in many ways. Al zawari (sp) is the next major one to be bagged. JMHO

[cyncooper]

This really isn't a bad thing what he is saying...I know we don't like him as a messanger - but I agree entirely.

It is an absolutely vile thing for him to say.

Period.

[Vigilantcitizen]

This really isn't a bad thing what he is saying...I know we don't like him as a messanger - but I agree entirely.

Clinton did NOTHING to go after Bin Laden. He was to busy spending resources going after "right wing extremists" and bombing Serb christians, which ironically, helped bin laden's friends out in the balkans.

He has no right whatsover to criticize the President over anything to do with the war on terror.

BTW...Who says we aren't concentrating on bin laden? Come back with me in October.