1 posted on
05/11/2004 6:28:36 PM PDT by
wjersey
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-110 next last
To: wjersey
Who cares what his opinion is?
2 posted on
05/11/2004 6:29:53 PM PDT by
MamaB
(mom to an angel)
To: wjersey
He should know as he shifted all interest from Bin laden!
To: wjersey
Excuse my language, but...
THAT MOTHER F*&#&$*&!!
4 posted on
05/11/2004 6:30:26 PM PDT by
Vigilantcitizen
(Don’t go around stating the world owes you a living; the world owes you nothing; it was here first.)
To: wjersey
Unlike the Rapist ... at least Bush is going after terrorists and their supporters.
Clinton is a complete scumbag.
5 posted on
05/11/2004 6:30:39 PM PDT by
Centurion2000
(Resolve to perform what you must; perform without fail that what you resolve.)
To: wjersey
go home, sit down and shut up bill
6 posted on
05/11/2004 6:31:14 PM PDT by
knak
To: wjersey
Why is it OK for Bill to try and stick to Bush (43) every chance he gets when Bush (41) remained silent about him?
9 posted on
05/11/2004 6:32:24 PM PDT by
wjersey
To: wjersey
Bill shifted his interest to under his desk in the oval office......STFU you POS
11 posted on
05/11/2004 6:33:05 PM PDT by
mystery-ak
(*They are all Pat Tillman's*........Rushl)
To: wjersey
Bubba erred by giving bush priority over everything.
To: wjersey
Whats that noise?
13 posted on
05/11/2004 6:33:30 PM PDT by
Unicorn
(Two many wimps around The democrats would rather win the WH then win the war-Tom Delay)
To: wjersey
Hmmmm? The same Bill Clinton who refused bin Laden when he was offered up to him? The same Bill Clinton who did absolutely nothing to stop either?
To: wjersey
Who cares what he thinks?
16 posted on
05/11/2004 6:34:05 PM PDT by
cardinal4
(Terrence Maculiffe-Ariolimax columbianus (hint- its a gastropod.....)
To: wjersey
Actually, Bill Clinton erred by giving Monica priority over bin Laden, Saddam, Arafat, etc.
17 posted on
05/11/2004 6:34:15 PM PDT by
republicandiva
(I need the state list back because I'm going "a little bonkers")
To: wjersey
Well, had Clinton showed any interest in getting Osama, there would never have been a 9/11. In 1998 he had the option to take Osama and either have him killed or arrested.
He was too busy giving Monica priority over Osama to do so though, and the rest is history.
To: wjersey
Had Clintoon arrested Bin Laden when he was OFFERED THE CHANCE, Bush wouldn't have had to hunt down Bin Laden and the WTC towers would STILL BE STANDING. But you won't read that in his book, will you . . . .
To: wjersey
The Land of Irrelevant is pure hell for poor Bill.
To: wjersey
this means nothing coming from a man who gave no one priority over himself
23 posted on
05/11/2004 6:35:48 PM PDT by
jla
To: wjersey
I for one would rather see Bin Ladin in jail than Saddam.
To: wjersey
Clinton erred by giving his little friend priority over the U.S.A.
26 posted on
05/11/2004 6:36:40 PM PDT by
BillF
(Fight terrorists in Iraq & elsewhere, instead of waiting for them to come to America!)
To: wjersey
The syphillis must have reached the tertiary stage by now....
27 posted on
05/11/2004 6:37:01 PM PDT by
clintonh8r
(Retrosexual Vietnam veteran against John Kerry, proud to be a "crook" and a "liar.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-110 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson