Skip to comments.
Bill Clinton says Bush erred by giving Saddam priority over bin Laden
Boston Globe (AP) ^
| 5/11/2004
| RICHARD PYLE
Posted on 05/11/2004 6:28:30 PM PDT by wjersey
NEW YORK -- President Bush wasted international sympathy for the United States after the 2001 terrorist attacks by shifting from the search for Osama bin Laden to the ousting of Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein, former President Clinton said Tuesday.
The move alienated many U.S. allies and created a false impression among Americans that Saddam had a key role in the al-Qaida-engineered terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, Clinton said. "I think the world was really pulling for us after 9-11," he said, but the Bush administration "divided the world ... to pursue our vision _ not because of any imminent threat but because that's what they wanted to do."
(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: elvisbinladen; muslims; shut; stfux42; up; x42
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 201-218 next last
To: willstayfree; livius
So, the 900...is that longhand pages, or after after somebody typed them in?
To: wjersey
This guy is completely NUTS Coo Koo. How could anyone have voted for this guy. I am at a loss. A man that put his unit above his Country, Is a man that can not be trusted.
To: graf008
Well, let's think this through with some perspective.
God help us, this thing was president. So, YES, it is different for him.
To: wjersey
The title:
Bill Clinton says Bush erred by giving Saddam priority over bin Laden
Question:.....
Did Bill Clinton err when he gave Monica priority?
124
posted on
05/11/2004 7:35:48 PM PDT
by
deport
(To a dog all roads lead home.......)
To: wjersey
Yo! Sh#$head Clinton! STFU. Nobody cares what you "think", you sleaze.
Go hawk your alleged "book" to morons.
125
posted on
05/11/2004 7:35:51 PM PDT
by
Hank Rearden
(Is Fallujah gone yet?)
To: wjersey
MIDI - END OF THE INNOCENCE
For several years they sang his song
he was a hero to their cause
In denial many lived
he placed himself up above the laws
He knew all of the right things to say
down through
hell and then back believers would go
In eight long years he's done to us
more damage than you know
For his neglect we would finally pay the price
the count's three thousand dead
We know just where to place the blame
it is on Bill Clinton's head
When the Cole was hit and brave men died
there is no doubt that he hadn't cried
He looked at his polls and sighed
Now this is the end
this is the end
of his legacy
At OKC he saw his chance
he needed to divide us all
He would create the vast right wing
and his mind-numbed fools would pick up the ball
So we'd fight among ourselves
and the
grand scheme had worked, he got his way
With our attention diverted he
would gut the CIA
For his neglect we would pay the price
the count's three thousand dead
We know just where to place the blame
it is on Bill Clinton's head
When the Cole was hit and brave men died
there is no doubt that he hadn't cried
He looked at his polls and sighed
Now this is the end
this is the end
of his legacy
We endured a psychopath
who saw himself as the Rockstar Prez
We had sent the warnings out
watch what this man does, not what he says
For neglect we paid the price
when those great buildings fell with many dead
And we know just where to place the blame
it's on Bill Clinton's head
When the Cole was hit and brave men died
there is no doubt that he hadn't cried
He looked at his polls and sighed
Now this is the end
this is the end
of his legacy
126
posted on
05/11/2004 7:36:49 PM PDT
by
doug from upland
(Don't wait until it is too late to stop Hillary -- do something today!)
To: cyncooper
That's a little different than I think of things - I tend to block out the messanger if there may be some truth to the message. If it was vile for someone to say something who I hated - the only person who could speak his mind would be George Will and maybe someone at the Cato Institute - maybe...
127
posted on
05/11/2004 7:37:42 PM PDT
by
graf008
To: wjersey
Oh, yeah?
Well, MamaLucci says that Bill Clinton erred by paying more attention to a fat, giggly,
intern, than he did to national security.
128
posted on
05/11/2004 7:37:53 PM PDT
by
MamaLucci
(Libs, want answers on 911? Ask Clinton why he met with Monica more than with his CIA director.)
To: wjersey
I guess Bill Clinton is convinced he actually has something to say. He's also tricked himself into believing the country really gives two sh*ts.
To: deport
does one really have to answer this one.....is the yes answer as obvious as the reason gorelick is on the 911 panel.....
130
posted on
05/11/2004 7:38:16 PM PDT
by
ldish
To: graf008
Or to put it simply: He should keep his fat trap SHUT.
Look at the 8 long years of corruption and carryings on and what did George H. W. Bush say? Nothing. He merely threatened to at the Republican convention in 2000 when this thing was talking about GWB and his "daddy" in a disparaging way. And just the threat that 41 would say something critical of Clinton sent the media into spasms of outrage at the thought of a *former president criticizing a sitting president*. Why, it just isn't done! We were told.
We are not informed or aided in any way to hear him put down our president and our country. Vile.
To: wjersey
Bill Clinton erred when he gave more attention to his pee-wee and Monica instead of Saddam or Osama.
To: graf008
He even gave decent reasons for why we should invade Iraq (that were echoed by Tony Blair frequently but less so by President Bush). And for your information, Clinton met with Blair before the war to try and talk him OUT of supporting us. He also visited France and Germany.
The man keeps an eye on the polls and knows which way the wind blows and that's how he frames his public pronouncements so he can hedge his position.
To: graf008
You made me laugh, I needed that today.
And it was easy to think that once we toppled him, we could build a stable country in Iraq since there was no (or little) 'cult of Saddam'.
Despite what you may believe, their is a cult following. It's not Saddam's people or his Republican Guard, but countries and regimes and people outside of Iraq-270 to be exact [from the last known information] that were propping Saddam up and in turn propping up Al Queada and other terrorists. You do see the bigger picture don't you?
From what I've seen from the beginning of the televised war, Iraq is an ammo dump of all kinds of weapons.
Whether we've killed bin Laden or not Americans are still targets and whether they're killed in his name or Allah's they're still dead. I don't think terrorists really need an excuse. And if they did and that was the reason for Berg's death-prisoner abuses-then we must be dealing with a weaker crop of terrorists. (last statement said purely in jest).
The bottom line is, from my point of view, it's all a war on terrorism. Doesn't matter the next celebrity terrorist to rise. Let's hope Saydr or Al zawari is next.
134
posted on
05/11/2004 7:43:46 PM PDT
by
swheats
To: wjersey
Clinton erred by giving Monica priority over bin Laden and Saddam.
To: wjersey
Such a Jack A"s.
There is no dignity in this man. Even in the extreme possibility he was right, recent presidents don't critize the current one. Especially at a time of war.
Is there anyone else that wants to kick the military's teeth in in the interest of self-aggrandizement?
136
posted on
05/11/2004 7:44:34 PM PDT
by
MN_Mike
(In Pelosi, Kerry and the Blow Fish (Kennedy) We Mis-Trust)
To: cyncooper
Perhaps...
Though in my mind our government has been and will always be corrupt to its core. There are better messengers at the top (like now and 41, 40), but corruption was still there - we just find it when we want to find it and ignore it when we don't.
But I digress - the message I think was right - even if the messanger is flawed. I also think the message was right when he articulated his justifications for backing Bush in the war in Iraq. I don't think he is putting down Bush by saying what he is saying. He is merely disagreeing. I don't hear him saying Bush is a "stupid doodyhead" or anything. Just saying that he thinks a strategic error was made. This is the stuff of political discourse that we have in this country and makes this country wonderful - people disagreeing on policy.
137
posted on
05/11/2004 7:46:08 PM PDT
by
graf008
To: graf008
Give me a break.
To: wjersey
And...clinton, you erred in putting Monica and your sexual interest before Bin Laden.
Though, you are irrelevant.
To: wjersey
And Clinton should have gone after Bin Laden instead of Monica.
140
posted on
05/11/2004 7:53:10 PM PDT
by
Reagan is King
(The modern definition of 'racist' is someone who is winning an argument with a liberal.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 201-218 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson