I find it interesting how gutless many people are when it comes to matters like this to say publicly what most people think to themselves. After 9/11, few people had problems with using real torture if that's what it took to get information out of those responsible. Here we have essentially fraternity pranks conducted on terrorists and armed combatants attempting to kill our soldiers.
What are you referring to? I didn't see a photo of a dog biting a man. It looked like they were just taunting him. Actually a few little dog bites wouldn't be too bad an idea either if it would extract information and save lives. I see nothing wrong with using any means necessary to defend our soldiers. The only mistake made was the photos were taken and leaked to the press.
Here we have essentially fraternity pranks conducted on terrorists and armed combatants attempting to kill our soldiers. "Fraternity pranks" like this get fraternities shut down, buster.
And, these men weren't armed.
They were buck naked with their hands shackled behind their backs!
Actually a few little dog bites wouldn't be too bad an idea either if it would extract information and save lives. I see nothing wrong with using any means necessary to defend our soldiers.
Every military expert I've heard, including several on this forum, said that this kind of technique is the last thing that should be used to extract information, as it WOULD....NOT....WORK!
The only mistake made was the photos were taken and leaked to the press.
So, any means is OK with you, as long as we don't know about it?
You are one sick puppy.