To: Joe Hadenuf
Interstates are full of cameras, everything is recorded. Back roads have much less of this type of surveillance. You think?
Even so, how many Ryder trucks travel through that section of I-26 each day, and how much notice would one get?
166 posted on
05/09/2004 6:00:06 PM PDT by
Amelia
(It's the culture, stupid....or the lack thereof.)
To: Amelia
Looks to me as if they'd have been less conspicuous on the interstate. Doesn't make sense. Not quite. Interstates are full of cameras, everything is recorded. Back roads have much less of this type of surveillance.
You think?
Yes, I do.
174 posted on
05/09/2004 6:06:08 PM PDT by
Joe Hadenuf
(I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
To: Amelia
I'd like to read this article from the local rag but can't find it on the web site although it's listed on the front page of the paper......
195 posted on
05/09/2004 6:27:58 PM PDT by
deport
(To a dog all roads lead home.......)
To: Amelia
Interstates are full of cameras, everything is recorded. Back roads have much less of this type of surveillance. Interstates throught the wilds of NC and TN are not full of cameras. We've only got new fangled things like cameras in the big cities.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson