Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PatrickHenry
> At that point I break off the conversation.

See, there, ya go, being all reasonable...

Anyway, what I was suggesting was that invoking that law would indicate termination of discussion. But that is, I imagine, a bit vainglorious. Almost as bad as claiming to know that the reason why people don't believe as I do is because they're rebelling...
251 posted on 05/06/2004 5:01:29 PM PDT by orionblamblam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies ]


To: orionblamblam
See, there, ya go, being all reasonable...

In my early days on this forum I was far more combative. Those were the days before we had moderators. Great days. Lots of fun. Now, I'm a kinder, gentler PatrickHenry. Anyway, when breaking off the conversation -- something you must do! -- you could always announce your reason if it makes you feel better: "Well, if you're going to say X, then I can see there's no reason to continue, so I'm dropping out of our debate." But your opponent will almost always respond with some lame claim to victory. That used to bother me, but I now see how utterly predictable it is, so I just let it go. It's fine with me if he wants to tell his buddies about the time he "defeated" some "Darwinist" on the internet.

252 posted on 05/06/2004 5:33:17 PM PDT by PatrickHenry (A compassionate evolutionist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson