Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jupiter's Moon Io, Continues To Puzzle Scientific Researchers
Creation-Evolution Headlines ^ | 5/04/2004 | Creation-Evolution Headlines

Posted on 05/04/2004 8:21:26 PM PDT by bondserv

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-307 next last

1 posted on 05/04/2004 8:21:27 PM PDT by bondserv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Elsie; AndrewC; jennyp; lockeliberty; RadioAstronomer; LiteKeeper; Fester Chugabrew; ...
PingIo....
2 posted on 05/04/2004 8:22:17 PM PDT by bondserv (Alignment is critical!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bondserv
4.6 billion year BUMP.
3 posted on 05/04/2004 8:26:37 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bondserv
ROFL.....

Well, here's one to think about. There are an INCREDIBLE number of volcanic features on earth, and a huge number of separate, discrete lava flows and ash deposits indicative of eruptions, many of them massive.

If the earth was actually only 6,000 years old, There would literally have to be a really massive eruption every few days and large eruptions literally every few minutes, to a degree that there's no way life as we know it could have survived...there would have been a near-continuous cloud of dense volcanic ash making normal agriculture impossible.
4 posted on 05/04/2004 8:26:50 PM PDT by John H K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bondserv
Nonsense.
5 posted on 05/04/2004 8:32:58 PM PDT by quantim (Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bondserv
But that would be aiding and abetting the enemy, the young-earth creationists.
I'm a Christian and a creationist but I just can't buy the idea of young-earth creationism. There's nothing in the Bible or in science to support it. Perhaps Io is younger than 4.6 billion years. All that proves is that Io is younger than most (perhaps all) of the planets and moons in our system.

Further, why is Io the only moon to exhibit this "youngness?" If young-earth creationism were true, then we would expect all of the planets and moons to appear "young." Io is the odd one out.


6 posted on 05/04/2004 8:33:33 PM PDT by DallasMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasMike
I'm a Christian and a creationist but I just can't buy the idea of young-earth creationism.

Shhhh. The evo crowd wants to believe all creationists are 6Kers. Gives them a nice straw dog to thrash.

7 posted on 05/04/2004 8:37:33 PM PDT by In_25_words_or_less (It's more a guideline than a rule ;o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bondserv
All these worlds are yours
except Europa.
Attempt no landing there.

Use them together.
Use them in peace.


8 posted on 05/04/2004 8:38:49 PM PDT by Petronski (Hubris knows no editor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: In_25_words_or_less
Eh, plenty of them are...certainly enough of it posted on FR (though you don't see as many posters that are actually YECs...though there are a few.)

YEC is too stupid for even the average creationidiot (which is like a terrorist being "too violent" for Al Queda"), though, hence the move to Intelligent Design.
9 posted on 05/04/2004 8:40:15 PM PDT by John H K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bondserv
All these worlds are your's..........
10 posted on 05/04/2004 8:41:31 PM PDT by squidly (I have always felt that a politician is to be judged by the animosity he excites among his opponents)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
2010. Great movie.
11 posted on 05/04/2004 8:45:10 PM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bondserv

12 posted on 05/04/2004 8:51:03 PM PDT by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: squidly
All these worlds are your's..........

Negative. Creation-Evolution Headlines is a website run by David Coppedge who works for NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratories.

13 posted on 05/04/2004 8:54:46 PM PDT by bondserv (Alignment is critical!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: bondserv
"most of the moons in the solar system possess young-looking features that defy long ages"

Including Earths moon which was found to have mere inches of dust accumulation instead of the 100 ft. estimate based on a Darwinian time line.
14 posted on 05/04/2004 9:09:35 PM PDT by Amish with an attitude (Entropy is the greatest foe of evolution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John H K
Macro-Evolution is a lie. I'll give you 20 Trillion years, and your theory falls flat on it's face.

The theory of Evolution is like attributing the production of a sandcastle to the ocean because you observed the water creating the mote.

Two men become stranded on a remote island. As they explore the island they come upon a sandcastle with towers, buttresses and a drawbridge. The design of the castle is amazingly intricate.

One man comments, "It is amazing what time and the ocean can create. The small rocks and seashells on the shore must have got caught in eddies and swirled around and chiseled out that castle. There were a few palm leaves floating by that scribed out the little lines that look like bricks. We are alone here and there is no need to consider anything else."

The other man looked at him incredulously and said, "No, that castle was created by another intelligent being with a clear intent of design, we are not alone."
15 posted on 05/04/2004 9:10:57 PM PDT by bondserv (Alignment is critical!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bondserv
Petronski beat me to it anyway.
16 posted on 05/04/2004 9:12:13 PM PDT by squidly (I have always felt that a politician is to be judged by the animosity he excites among his opponents)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Amish with an attitude
Including Earths moon which was found to have mere inches of dust accumulation instead of the 100 ft. estimate based on a Darwinian time line.

The moon dust argument has long been discredited.

17 posted on 05/04/2004 9:14:02 PM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: bondserv
Thanks for the ping.
18 posted on 05/04/2004 9:14:27 PM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bondserv
Everything I learned about Io, I learned here --


19 posted on 05/04/2004 9:16:50 PM PDT by doug from upland (Don't wait until it is too late to stop Hillary -- do something today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
You are indeed correct, it was discredited at the instant the lunar lander touched down. What is you point?
20 posted on 05/04/2004 9:20:27 PM PDT by Amish with an attitude (Entropy is the greatest foe of evolution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-307 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson