Skip to comments.
Reuters: "Christians massacre hundreds of Muslims"
Reuters/Int Herald Tribune ^
| 5.5.04
Posted on 05/04/2004 6:02:43 PM PDT by ambrose
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next last
To: bondjamesbond
hahah that made my day.
41
posted on
05/04/2004 6:36:55 PM PDT
by
KillTime
To: ambrose
How do we really know if these are Christians? Are the animists and local religious beliefs setting on the sidelines or are they also involved?
Maybe it is a conglomeration of non-muslims who do not want to be treated as slaves by the moslems. Maybe they want something better than Shiara law in which all non moslems have no rights!
If you knew that tomorrow YOU would be now under Shiara law would you not fight and kill to avoid it?
To: Mr. Mojo
The violence began when muslims became outraged over a beauty pageant a year or so back. (I think)
43
posted on
05/04/2004 6:39:06 PM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(you tell em i'm commin.... and hells commin with me.)
To: antiRepublicrat
Yes, it is, and thanks for saying so.
Christians tend to be quite peaceful when they're not being hacked up to pieces with machetes.
44
posted on
05/04/2004 6:41:49 PM PDT
by
Ramius
(Objects in post may be larger than they appear.)
To: cripplecreek
Yeah, the Miss Universe or Miss World pageant was to be held in Nigeria and the Koraniacs went ballistic.
But I'm quite sure they committed atrocities well before that time.
45
posted on
05/04/2004 6:42:19 PM PDT
by
Mr. Mojo
To: cripplecreek
"The violence began when muslims became outraged over a beauty pageant a year or so back." I remember that, maybe all this could have been avoided if the goat was allowed to be entered into the pageant.
46
posted on
05/04/2004 6:42:39 PM PDT
by
TBall
To: ambrose
Christians massacre hundreds of Muslims Halle - f&^(*ng - lujah
ML/NJ
47
posted on
05/04/2004 6:43:13 PM PDT
by
ml/nj
To: ambrose
Where were these news people when the headline should have read: Hundreds of thousands of Christians murdered in Sudan (UN turns blind eye as usual)
48
posted on
05/04/2004 6:43:48 PM PDT
by
TrueBeliever9
(aut viam inveniam aut faciam (where there is a will - there is a way)
To: antiRepublicrat
Your attempt to show moral equivalence is morally bankrupt.
49
posted on
05/04/2004 6:44:24 PM PDT
by
Mr. Mojo
To: ambrose
I pray that Israel sends every one of these islamist animals to their god in hell.
To: ambrose
Let's Roll !!!
To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
Didn't we all know there was more to this story that Goiters doesn't tell us?
52
posted on
05/04/2004 6:49:15 PM PDT
by
Lijahsbubbe
(John Kerry is a dingleberry)
To: JoeSchem; All
If we followed you logic...then GWB is false to his religion and should have voluntarily offered the neck of the nation to Islamic slaughter and anal dhimmitude!
These nigerian militiamen are not merely killing for revenge but are defending the lives of their families and relatives. Jesus said to "turn the other cheek" in relation to how individuals are to treat one another in the name of Christ.
How-ever governments and ethnic groups of individuals(quasi governmental authorities) are looked at differently. They are charged to defend the nation or group and are given the "sword" as Paul wrote to execute law and justice amongst evil doers. The worst mistake the Huguenots made in France was to give up their arms to a duplicitous Catholic royalty.
The national Nigerian Government is weak and somebody must defend these Christians from being slaughtered!
53
posted on
05/04/2004 6:50:21 PM PDT
by
mdmathis6
(The Democrats must be defeated in 2004)
To: cripplecreek
"Reuters: "Christians massacre hundreds of Muslims"
Good Gravy this what a horrible way of stating what SHOULD be the Headline:
Christians send muslims into the willing arms of 72 Virgins!
54
posted on
05/04/2004 6:51:05 PM PDT
by
Dacus943
To: JoeSchem
In following such tactics, Christians are no longer Christians. Bullshit .... christians can go to war when it is just. Whan you are facing annihilation it is certainly justified.
The Christian at War
55
posted on
05/04/2004 6:51:57 PM PDT
by
Centurion2000
(Resolve to perform what you must; perform without fail that what you resolve.)
To: ambrose
Nothing wrong with Christians defending themselves and fighting back. Only an idiot would not do this.
56
posted on
05/04/2004 6:52:38 PM PDT
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
To: All
When was the last time that Rueters printed a "Muslims massacre Christians" or "Muslims destroy numerous churches", etc...
To: ambrose
I also suspect Roto Reuters is exaggerating this since they favor terrorists. Oh, I forgot. They don't like to label anyone a "terrorist" because to someone else they maybe heroes.
58
posted on
05/04/2004 6:54:37 PM PDT
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
To: Ramius
I don't remember any part of the story talking about self-defense or a preemptive defensive attack. Sounds to me like a simple massacre over land claims by that other well-known "Religion of Peace."
To: Arpege92
Self-defense is justified. Payback is not Christian, but rather the superseded "eye for an eye" mentality.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson