Replies

"Voting for a pro-abortion liberal Democrat OR a pro-abortion liberal Republican tells the GOP to just keep doing what they are doing."

So, what you are saying is that you are so upset at the fact that this "pro-abortion Liberal" keeps getting elected to the Senate in your State, that you are willing to teach them a lesson by allowing an even more pro-abortion liberal candidate to be elected?

The message you would send is that the more pro-abortion liberal one is, the more likely one is to get elected.

Both candidates are equally pretty bad for pre-born kids. Can you imagine how bad Specter will be if he is in control of the judiciary committee?

Can you imagine how bad it will be for pre-born kids, if Hoeffel wins the election?

BTW, I live in NYS and was a registered member of the NYS Conservative Party, until a couple of years ago when they started backing pro-abortion RINOs - at least for the most part.

Anyway, when the NYS Conservative Party was actually conservative, James Buckley won as a Conservative Party candidate.

So to make a short story long, or is it a long story short, occasionally 3rd parties DO win!

Well I think that the mood is right for a 3rd party to win in PA this year (like the Constitution Party) in the Senate's race. It was nothing short of amazing that Congressman Toomey only lost by 2% againt a strong incumbent, & did not have nearly as much money as Specter.

Of course, there are never guarantees in life, but PA folks have until November to think about it.

I understand your argument that PA is liberal; however, the whole nation is becoming more conservative, so maybe PA is, too.