Homosexual leader vows to 'torture' opponents

WorldNetDaily ^ | April 30, 2004

[scripter]

The head of a national homosexual organization is vowing to politically "punish," "terrify" and "torture" activists who oppose his organization's agenda on "gay" rights – which he says would give him "endless satisfaction."

Matt Foreman, executive director of the National Gay & Lesbian Task Force in Washington, D.C., made the comments in yesterday's edition of Between the Lines, a Detroit area homosexual newsmagazine, the American Family Association of Michigan points out.

In addition to declaring his desire for retribution against "local legislators and leaders" who oppose the homosexual agenda, Foreman expressed a goal beyond securing legal same-sex marriage, that is gaining other means besides marriage by which homosexuals could access public and private financial benefits.

Foreman told the interviewer of his plans to go after his opponents.

"I'm … interested in going after, politically, local legislators and leaders that have launched these anti-gay initiatives," he explained. "'We beat you, now we're gonna go back and we're going to affirmatively punish you' – people who launch this stuff, so that they understand not only that they're not going to win, but that there are consequences to it.

"We would set up a [political action committee] and go in and terrify them with a credible challenge. ... So we go in, for a modest investment of money and torture these people, which would give me endless satisfaction. And the word would go out very quickly, 'You know what, this really isn't worth it.'"

Foreman was asked: "Is getting the right to marriage for same-sex couples something the Task Force is interested in?"

He responded: "We want full equality under the law, which, right now, means the freedom to marry. But we're also hopeful that we create different ways in which people can form relationships and families that don't come with all the baggage and the downsides of marriage. One of the great things about where we're going is that we are creating new ways for people to relate, new ways for people to obtain rights and benefits."

According to Between the Lines, Foreman is scheduled to be the keynote speaker at the annual Triangle Foundation Dinner on May 2 in Detroit.

[usadave]

He (Foreman) responded: "We want full equality under the law, which, right now, means the freedom to marry.

These people already have full equality under the law, and they already have the freedom to marry. They just don't have the separate, unequal, and exclusive right to marry each other.

[Travis McGee]

2% of the population really should be careful about continually sticking a sharp stick into the eye of the normal majority. Sooner or later, our patience with their perverse antics is going to run out.

Sooner or later, we're going to take out the trash.

[Uncle Meat]

Then I find out that the bar has many gay's in it

It wasn't called the "Blue Oyster"was it?

[EdReform]

Bump

[EdReform]

I wonder when the homosexuals who disagree with this tactic will speak up.

Indeed!

[Tropicalwatcher]

I agree with you on that.

[BattleFlag]

"But we're also hopeful that we create different ways in which people can form relationships and families that don't come with all the baggage and the downsides of marriage. One of the great things about where we're going is that we are creating new ways for people to relate, new ways for people to obtain rights and benefits."

I don't think I am overly paranoid to believe that what is being talked about in rather unambiguous terms above is a change in acceptable (from the standpoint of the law) configurations, or a range of "acceptable" configurations of marriage so that it can be recognised for the sake of obtaining benefits.

Could it be that marriage will possibly contain more than two in a mix and match sort of scenario?

Two homosexuals, a bi-sexual and a transgender?

And whoever is holding the Blue Cross Blue Shield card gets to add everyone else?

Or the other marriage "partners" get the inheritance before lesser related blood relatives?

Just brainstorming where "But we're also hopeful that we create different ways in which people can form relationships and families...." and "new ways for people to obtain rights and benefits." will lead.

It seems though that if this is anything like what could take place it will be next to impossible without a good, strong socialist infrastructure.

[RightOnline]

Yeah, well, give me half a chance.......and I'll show him "torture" like he'd never forget.

[RightOnline]

"This guy is a monster who should be locked up."

You're half right. Why waste cell space for such excrement?

[EdReform]

BTTT

[Bryan]

Interesting.

[EdReform]

Indeed! So is this:

Disarming Parents of Elementary Students About Homosexuality (unbelievable...)

[Travis McGee]

bttt

[EdReform]

Additional threads describing threatening and malicious behavior by the homosexual community:

"Gay Militia" Storms Christian Dinner in Calgary ( click here for video of the queer protesters )

This is the hill we must defend! Mayday For Marriage

Thousands Protest Gay Marriage in Seattle