[VeritatisSplendor]

No! We got SC wrong, and it was the ONLY state we got wrong in 11/02. We got MO right -- we called it a statistical tie (Carnahan 49-47) and it was a tie (Talent 50-49). Given the tendency of undecideds to break against the incumbent, I don't see how we could have done a heck of a lot better. If I could get a 3-point spread error in every election we do, I'd take it, and so would any other pollster! Go here for the details.

[KQQL]

I know all polls, I don't need to go anywhere.
( if Surveyusa wants to hide behind MoE , that's your business)

You folks predicted a Talent loss in MO, and that was in correct.


(Overall you folks did a great job , minus SC and MO)

RESEACH 2000 got MO right and Mason Dixon got SC right.