[biblewonk]

Funny. I did tell Protest-1 that whenever i question someone about this, asking for biblical proof, they either say some smirky (or at times outrightly vitriolic) comment , or they hush. I guess you must be the former BibleWonk because i do not see how my reading of the Bible pertains to this. And to answer your question, I read it a lot. And not only in the normal translations but in the direct greek and Hebrew translations. And i have never found a place that says the world is 6,000 years old, nor have i found a place that says paying indulgences will lead to salvation, etc etc. And that is why i am asking if YOU have.

You seem to be the one with the attitude problem.

I read the bible every day. I've read it about 30-40 times. It never ceases to amaze me how many people read it much less and are quite qualified to tell me all about what it means and says.

I already told you where it says the age of the universe. If you are demanding where the number 6000 years is in the bible then you have a serious problem.

[Clobbersaurus]

I'm asking this to be serious, so please don't jump all over me, but I'm not really sure I understand your position.

Are you actually saying that all of the scientific evidence about cavemen, ice ages, continental drift, dinosaurs, etc etc. is just all wrong? How can that be? How can everyone be wrong?