Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Death of Freedoms of Speech, Religion In Canada
CFAC - Canada Family Action Coalition ^ | April 28, 2004 | CFAC Press Release

Posted on 04/28/2004 7:03:12 PM PDT by GMMAC

Liberal dominated Senate Oppresses Free Speech CFAC News Release April 28, 2004 - For Immediate Release

"Today the Senate sounded the final death knell in legislation that will severely limit free speech and freedom of religion and even freedom of the press in Canada," says Brian Rushfeldt, Executive Director, Canada Family Action Coalition (CFAC). "As other democratic nations watch in amazement, Martin's Liberal government and the Liberal controlled Senate have passed Bill C-250, a draconian piece of legislation that will criminalize people who express an opinion contrary to homosexual behaviour, including views based on religion, conscience, morality, and even medical or humanitarian concerns."

Given the undefined, ambiguous wording in this severely flawed piece of legislation, Christians and other faith groups are worried that expressing their religious or moral views, or even quoting from the Bible or another religious text, may become a criminal act, says Rushfeldt. Every Canadian citizen who publicly opposes homosexual behavior will be criminalized, he says.

He points out that terms in the legislation, including 'hatred', 'promoting hatred' and 'sexual orientation' remain undefined. They will be determined only one is "taken" to court.

"I have been accused by homosexual activists of 'promoting hatred' simply for expressing the view that marriage should remain defined as between one man and one woman. Will expressing that view now make me a criminal? Will a religious leader who expresses the view that homosexuality is immoral be convicted of a hate crime? Will a parent who refuses to allow her child to take a sex education class promoting homosexuality be criminalized? Nobody can answer those questions, for it will now be up to the courts to interpret the ambiguous wording in this legislation."

Based on recent court decisions, CFAC has grave concerns about how this law will be applied and interpreted by judges. "There is a growing trend among courts and human rights tribunals to rule against religious freedom in favor of homosexual 'rights'," he points out.

"Civilized democracies are founded upon basic principles of freedom of speech, thought, opinion and religion. The Canadian Liberal government and the Senate have struck a severe and destructive blow against democratic freedoms. It is a little like Communists arresting someone because some authority decided you broke some law."

"The only solution now is to elect a government that will rescind or amend this dangerous undemocratic law. The fight is not over. We will be asking people not to vote for those MPs responsible for this."


TOPICS: Canada; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: canada; churchandstate; family; freedomofreligion; gayagenda; homosexualagenda; totalitarianism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: Loyalist
You may think it's a little queer, but I pledge to work until I'm all fag-tired and my wrist goes limp from typing, breaking this gay "law".
41 posted on 04/29/2004 12:22:29 PM PDT by jodorowsky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

Bump for later
42 posted on 04/29/2004 1:27:13 PM PDT by Alex Murphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Entropy Squared
How about the Canadian Constitution and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms -- is there any freedom of speech protection analogous to the US' First Amendment that could be used to trump statutory "hate speech" laws? Of course the protections here in the US only exist because judiciary interpretation has broadly interpreted the right to free speech, esp. with Oliver Wendell Holmes' "clear and present danger" standard as to when incendiary speech may be outlawed. Given the track record of the Canadian judiciary in cracking down on Christians' rights, I'm sure they would find a way to uphold the statute.
43 posted on 04/29/2004 2:38:17 PM PDT by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Entropy Squared
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms has the following two provisions:

1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.

2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: (a) freedom of conscience and religion; (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication; (c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and (d) freedom of association.

I guess a court could find that the "hate speech" laws would be "reasonable limits" under clause 1 that would obviate the rights under clause 2.

44 posted on 04/29/2004 2:57:19 PM PDT by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC
Hedonism is still OK.
45 posted on 04/29/2004 3:08:34 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson