Reveals a lot about the mindset here that they think attacking Darwin (d. 1881) is going to change anything in 2004. The way science works, he was only the first Darwinist.
The way religion works, it makes sense. Attack the Prophet, his revealed word is discredited. But Darwin isn't the Prophet. He's just the first person to point out something, a thing for which a lot more evidence has been unearthed since he died than he ever saw in his day.